- Newsletters

Just hours before government funding was set to expire, President Trump on March 23 signed the bipartisan Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, averting a government shutdown. The $1.3 trillion fiscal year 2018 omnibus spending package, which provides funding for the government and federal agencies through September 30, contains several tax provisions and increased IRS funding.

The House approved the spending bill by a 256-to-167 vote on March 22. The Senate cleared the measure by a 65-to-32 vote.

Grain Glitch
The so-called "grain glitch" addressed within the omnibus package aims to fix an unintended consequence in the "pass-through" income deduction. The deduction is provided in new Code Sec. 199A, which was enacted last December as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97).

Before the fix, grain and other agricultural products sold to cooperatives received a tax advantage because those sales were deductible from a farmer’s gross sales. Sales to companies other than cooperatives were deductible only from net business income. The inadvertent advantage had been given to cooperatives as part of a drafting error, according to several Republican lawmakers.

The appropriations bill repeals the provision in Code Sec. 199A that allowed farmers to deduct 20 percent of their gross sales to cooperatives. As modified, the deduction is now limited to 20 percent of farmers’ net income, excluding capital gains. "This legislation restores the competitive balance in the agricultural marketplace by leveling the tax burden on independent and cooperative farming businesses," Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., said in a March 22 statement. The bill also modifies the deduction that is allowed to agricultural or horticultural cooperatives.

Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
Although Democrats have previously expressed an unwillingness to help Republicans correct issues within the new tax law, the parties agreed to the grain glitch fix in exchange for an expansion of the low-income house tax credit. The expansion is also included in the spending bill.

"This is the first increase in over a decade," Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wa., said on March 22. "Nearly $3 billion is a good start towards tackling the housing crisis in our cities and rural communities," she added. Cantwell spearheaded the efforts among Democrats for the credit’s expansion.

Technical Corrections
Numerous other technical corrections to previous tax bills spanning from 2004-2016 were included in the spending bill, none of which specifically address the TCJA. Included among the fixes are technical corrections to the partnership audit rules.

IRS Funding
The legislation provides the IRS with $11.43 billion in funding, close to $196 million more than currently enacted levels. $320 million is allocated specifically for implementation of the TCJA. The Trump administration had requested $397 million for implementation of the new tax law. According to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, the increased resources would provide an update to antiquated telephone systems and technology.

White House
President Trump rattled Capitol Hill on March 23 when he announced just hours before government funding was set to expire that he may not sign the government spending bill. Although Mick Mulvaney, Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) said on March 22 that the President would sign the omnibus package, President Trump took to Twitter on March 23 to suggest otherwise. "I am considering a veto of the omnibus spending bill…," Trump said in a tweet.

While Trump did, in fact, wind up signing the spending bill, which tops 2,200 pages, he told reporters at the White House that he was "unhappy" to do so. Trump criticized the $1.3 trillion omnibus package for being the second largest in history. "I say to Congress, I will never sign another bill like this again. I’m not going to do it again. Nobody read it. It’s only hours old," Trump said.

Close

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has renewed its call for immediate guidance on new Code Sec. 199A. The AICPA highlighted questions about qualified business income (QBI) of pass-through income under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97). "Taxpayers and practitioners need clarity regarding QBI in order to comply with their 2018 tax obligations," the AICPA said in a February 21 letter to the Service.

New Deduction
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act created Code Sec. 199A. The deduction is temporary and begins this year.

Generally, qualified taxpayers may deduct up to 20 percent of domestic QBI from a partnership, S corporation or sole proprietorship. Congress put in place a limitation based on wages paid, or on wages paid plus a capital element, among other requirements. Certain service trades or businesses generally may not take advantage of the deduction but there are exceptions.

Almost immediately after passage of the new tax law, the AICPA and other tax professional groups urged on the IRS to move quickly on guidance. Recently, the National Society of Accountants (NSA) reported that the IRS would issue guidance on Code Sec. 199A this summer.

Immediate Concern
The AICPA identified several areas of immediate concern. They are:

Definition of Code Sec. 199A qualified business income.
Aggregation method for calculation of QBI of pass-through businesses.
Deductible amount of QBI for a pass-through entity with business in net loss.
Qualification of wages paid by an employee leasing company.
Application of Code Sec. 199A to an owner of a fiscal year pass-through entity ending in 2018.
Availability of deduction for Electing Small Business Trusts (ESBTs).

Services
The AICPA asked the IRS to describe what activities are included in the definition of a services trade or business. "The guidance should clarify that the definition of the term ‘accounting services’ includes any services associated with the determination of tax liabilities including preparation, tax planning, cost segregation services, services rendered with respect to tax credits and deductions, and similar consultative services,"the AICPA told the Service.

Close

A top House tax writer has confirmed that House Republicans and the Trump administration are working on a second phase of tax reform this year. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Tex., said in an interview that the Trump administration and House Republicans "think more can be done."

A Ways and Means spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer on March 15 that "there are opportunities in making individual tax cuts permanent, increasing innovation, [and] encouraging household savings."Confirmation that House GOP tax writers are mulling additional tax changes to the tax code comes just days after President Trump announced that he and House Republicans are very serious about working on a “phase-two” of tax reform. Trump quipped that Brady is the "king of tax cuts."

Individual Tax Cuts
Among expected changes, in particular, the temporary individual tax cuts enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) could be made permanent, a Ways and Means spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer. For budgetary reasons, the cuts to individual tax rates and benefits were not made permanent under the new law. "While the tax cuts for families were long-term, they are not yet permanent, so we’re going to address issues like that," Brady said.

Criticism
Democratic lawmakers remain largely united in their criticisms of the TCJA. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., criticized the new tax law in a March 15 news conference for "giving 83 percent of the benefits to the top 1 percent, ultimately raising taxes for 86 million middle-class families while contending that it's a middle-class tax cut."

To that end, across the U.S. Capitol, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer has said Democrats would be reluctant to work with Republicans in making any fixes to the new tax law unless Republicans would be willing to address Democrats’ concerns with the law, as well. "We don't have much of an inclination, unless they want to open up other parts of the tax bill that we think need changes, to just help them clean up the mess they made," Schumer said.

Looking Forward
"Mainstream optimism is at record levels, our economy is really gaining momentum and booming in a big way," Brady said. "We’re always looking to improve the tax code," he said, adding that lawmakers are currently considering new ideas for tax reform. "We think there are some good ones." Lawmakers will not combine additional tax reform measures with technical corrections to the existing TCJA, according to Brady, emphasizing that any significant changes to come will be new ideas.

Close

The House Ways and Means Tax Policy Subcommittee held a March 14 hearing in which lawmakers and stakeholders examined the future of various temporary tax extenders post-tax reform. Over 30 tax breaks, which included energy and fuel credits, among others, were retroactively extended for the 2017 tax year in the Bipartisan Budget Act ( P.L. 115-123) enacted in February.

Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers have varying views on specific temporary tax provisions, but in general, seem to have largely been in agreement that year-end tax extenders are not good policy. New to the discussion, however, is whether such provisions are worthwhile now that business tax rates have been lowered along with full and immediate expensing under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97).

New Path Forward
The Ways and Means Committee is "charting a new path forward on temporary tax provisions,"Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Tex., said in his opening statement. "Temporary measures are rarely good tax policy."

According to Brady, numerous tax extenders only exist because of the previously outdated tax code and high tax rates. But now that tax reform has been enacted, these temporary tax breaks may serve less of a purpose. "Starting now, we’re going to apply a rigorous test to these temporary provisions,"Brady said.

To that end, Tax Policy Subcommittee Chairman Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., said that any temporary tax provision determined as no longer necessary post-tax reform should be eliminated. And, as for those that continue to serve an important role and enhance tax reform, permanence should be considered.

Tax Policy Subcommittee ranking member Lloyd Doggett, D-Tex., also weighing in on the issue, said that any temporary tax provisions that will remain need to be paid for moving forward. Additionally, Doggett criticized Republicans for not holding enough hearings on the TCJA, as well as the specific tax extenders currently under review. Doing so, he added, would enable needed discussion on relevancy as well as pay-fors.

Panels
Witnesses at the hearing were grouped into four panels, three of which consisted of several representatives from various industries including fuel, energy, and real estate. The other included witnesses from several think tanks and research organizations.

Generally, industry stakeholders argued that many of these temporary tax breaks remain important, even after tax reform. Buchanan, however, repeatedly asked witnesses why additional incentives were needed after tax cuts and full expensing were provided through tax reform under the TCJA. Several Republican lawmakers, including Buchanan, stated that tax provisions only add to the uncertainty of the tax system.

Several industry witnesses argued, in essence, that not all tax extenders are created equally and should thus be evaluated individually. Barry Grooms, testifying on behalf of the National Association of Realtors, told lawmakers that the tax exclusion for forgiven mortgage debt is unique and should be made a permanent part of our tax law. "Since it was first added to the Internal Revenue Code in 2007, this provision has provided much-needed financial relief for millions of distressed households,"Grooms testified. This exclusion makes the tax system fairer, Grooms added, stating that it provides assistance to families experiencing hardships.

Policy
Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, told lawmakers that tax extenders are generally poor policy and that most should be allowed to sunset. According to MacGuineas, not only do tax extenders add to the federal deficit, the temporary nature of tax extenders makes it difficult for businesses and individuals to plan and invest. "To be sure, there are sometimes legitimate reasons for temporary tax policy – to respond to a natural disaster or economic downturn, to test effectiveness, or to provide transition relief – but most of the tax extenders are temporary simply to hide their budgetary cost," MacGuineas testifed.

Likewise, David Burton, senior fellow in economic policy at The Heritage Foundation, spoke to the costliness of tax extenders. Burton testified that 13 energy tax extenders are unwarranted. "At roughly $53 billion over ten years, the revenue lost from these provisions is substantial," Burton included in his written testimony. Additionally, Burton told lawmakers that tax extenders make the tax system less fair.

Seth Hanlon, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, criticized Congress for not addressing tax extenders in the TCJA. Furthermore, Hanlon told lawmakers that tax extenders not only make the tax code more unstable and add to the federal deficit, but also complicate the IRS’s job during filing season.

"Congress should have ended the gimmicky routine on tax extenders long ago, and certainly should have done so in legislation that was billed as a once-in-a-generation tax reform," Hanlon testified. "But, better late than never."

Close

The IRS has released Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to address a taxpayer’s filing obligations and payment requirements with respect to the Code Sec. 965 transition tax, enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Creation Act ( P.L. 115-97). The instructions in the FAQs are for filing 2017 returns with an amount of Code Sec. 965 tax. Failure to follow the FAQs could result in difficulties in processing the returns. Taxpayers who are required to file electronically are asked to wait until April 2, 2018, to file returns so that the IRS can make system changes.

In general, Code Sec. 965 imposes a one-time tax on the untaxed post-1986 foreign earnings of foreign subsidiaries of U.S. shareholders by deeming the earnings to be repatriated. The foreign earnings held in the form of cash and cash equivalents are taxed at a 15.5 percent rate, and remaining earnings are taxed at an 8 percent rate. The taxpayer may elect to pay the tax in installments over eight years.

Amounts must be reported by a U.S. shareholders of deferred foreign income corporation (DFIC) or by a direct or indirect partner in a domestic partnership, a shareholder in an S corporation, or a beneficiary of another passthrough entity that is a U.S. shareholder of a DFIC.

The Appendix to Q&A 2 contains a table that describes, separately for individuals and entities, how items should be reported on the 2017 tax return. For example, an individual reports the Code Sec. 965(a) amount on Form 1040, Line 21, with the notation SEC 965 on the dotted line to the left of the Line.

A person with income under Code Sec. 965 is required to include with its return an IRC 965 Transition Tax Statement, signed under penalties of perjury, and in the case of an electronically filed return, in pdf format with the filename 965 tax. A Model statement is provided. Adequate records must be kept supporting the Code Sec. 965 inclusion amount, the deduction under Code Sec. 965(c), the net tax liability under Code Sec. 965, and any other underlying calculations of these amounts.

The FAQs provide details on how to make the multiple Code Sec. 965 elections, including the election to pay the tax in installments over eight years. For each election, a statement must be attached to the return and signed under the penalties of perjury, and in the case of an electronically filed return, in pdf format.

Form 5471 must also be filed with the 2017 return of a U.S. shareholder of a specified foreign corporation, regardless of whether the specified foreign corporation is a controlled foreign corporation. A statement containing information about the Code Sec. 965(a) inclusion must be attached to the Schedule K-1s of domestic partnerships, S corporations, or other passthrough entities.

Tax must be paid in two separate payments. One payment will reflect the tax owed, without Code Sec. 965. The second payment is the Code Sec. 965 payment. Both payments must be made by the due date of the applicable return (without extensions). Additional details for paying the tax are provided in the FAQs.

Persons who have already filed a 2017 tax return should consider filing an amended return based on the information in these FAQs and Appendices.

Close

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed an individual’s conviction for obstructing tax law administration. The government failed to show that the individual knew that a "proceeding" was pending when he engaged in the obstructive conduct.

Background
The individual owned and operated a freight service that transported items to and from the United States and Canada. The government charged the individual with violating the "omnibus clause" of Code Sec. 7212(a), which imposes criminal liability on anyone who "in any other way corruptly … obstructs or impedes, or endeavors to obstruct or impede, the due administration of" the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26).

The government alleged that the individual obstructed tax administration because he: (1) failed to maintain corporate books and records; (2) failed to provide his accountant with complete and accurate tax information; (3) destroyed business records; (4) was hiding income; and (5) was paying employees with cash. At trial, the jury was instructed that it must unanimously find that he corruptly engaged in one of the practices listed. However, the jury was not instructed that it had to find that the individual knew he was under investigation and intended to interfere with that investigation. Subsequently, the jury convicted the individual on all counts. Then, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Tax Law Administration
The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. According to the Court, the verbs "obstruct" and "impede" require an object. Therefore, the taxpayer must hinder a particular person or thing. Moreover, the omnibus clause serves as a "catchall" for the obstructive conduct, not as a catchall for every violation that interferes with tax law administration.

Nothing in the statute’s history suggested that Congress intended the omnibus clause to apply to the entire Internal Revenue Code, including the routine processing of tax returns, tax payments and tax refunds. Further, if the omnibus clause applied to all tax law administration, many tax misdemeanors might turn into felonies and make specific criminal provisions in the Code redundant. Accordingly, the phrase "due administration of" the tax code referred only to some acts, not everything the IRS does.

Overly Broad Interpretation
A broad interpretation of the omnibus clause would also risk the lack of fair warning. Interpreted broadly, the provision could apply to a person who paid a babysitter in cash without withholding taxes, left a large cash tip in a restaurant, failed to keep donation receipts, or failed to provide every record to their accountant. Such individuals may know they are violating an IRS rule. However, they would not think they could be prosecuted for obstruction. Further, if Congress intended that outcome, it should have made that clear in the statute.

Government’s Argument
Further, the Court rejected the government’s argument that the need to show the obstructive conduct was corrupt cured any overbreath problem. However, a taxpayer who "willfully" violates the tax code intends someone to obtain an unlawful advantage. Moreover, relying upon prosecutorial discretion to narrow an otherwise overbroad statute puts too much power in the hands of the prosecutor, and risks undermining public confidence in the criminal justice system. Therefore, to secure a conviction under the omnibus clause, the government was required to show that there was a nexus between the individual’s conduct and an investigation, audit or other targeted administrative action.

Reversing and remanding a CA-2 decision 2016-2 ustc ¶50,453.

Close

When your business' bottom line is not as healthy as it should be, laying people off eventually may become your only option. However, before you cut people from your business, consider implementing these cost-cutting measures for a healthier bottom line and greater peace of mind.

Revisit your budget. Most budgets have some fat in them. Take a good look at your existing budget: are there some areas of excess that you may not have previously noticed? Evaluate viable alternatives for expenses that could result in cost savings. For example, check your printing costs. Are you photocopying something that should actually be printed? If you make many copies of a document, you are not only racking up charges in paper and labor, you are also adding to the wear and tear on the machine. Consider having local printers bid on a few of these jobs. You should be able to save money.

Get new bids on jobs. As easy as it is to stay with the same vendors year after year, this practice can be costly. One of the best suggestions to lower your overall costs is to collect invoices of everything purchased in the last year and separate the 20 percent that represent 80 percent of all purchases. Send those out for new bids and you may find you can cut your costs significantly.

Turn to your employees. Consider having them take responsibility for the costs associated with their positions. Ask them for suggestions on ways to cut costs. Most of them will be able to give you at least a few suggestions or point out some areas of waste. Once you have evaluated their suggestions, put the good ideas to work.

With a little work and a lot of persistence, you may be able to avoid the unpleasant task of laying off employees in a business downturn by simply tightening your business's belt. Please feel free to contact the office for additional suggestions and information.

Close

The benefits of owning a vacation home can go beyond rest and relaxation. Understanding the special rules related to the tax treatment of vacation homes can not only help you with your tax planning, but may also help you plan your vacation.

The benefits of owning a vacation home can go beyond rest and relaxation. Understanding the special rules related to the tax treatment of vacation homes cannot only help you with your tax planning, but may also help you plan your vacation.

For tax purposes, vacation homes are treated as either rental properties or personal residences. How your vacation home is treated depends on many factors, such as how often you use the home yourself, how often you rent it out and how long it sits vacant. Here are some general guidelines related to the tax treatment of vacation homes.

Treated as Rental Property

Your home will fall under the tax rules for rental properties rather than for personal residences if you rent it out for more than 14 days a year, and if your personal use doesn't exceed (1) 14 days or (2) 10% of the rental days, whichever is greater.

Example - You rent your beach cottage for 240 days and vacation 23 days. Your home will be treated as a rental property. If you had vacationed for 1 more day (for a total of 24 days), though, your home would be back under the personal residence rules.

Income: Generally, rental income should be fully included in gross income. However, there is an exception. If the property qualifies as a residence and is rented for fewer than 15 days during the year, the rental income does not need to be included in your gross income.

Expenses: Interest, property taxes and operating expenses should all be allocated based on the total number of days the house was used. The taxes and interest allocated to personal use are not deductible as a direct offset against rental income. In the example above, the total number of days used is 263, so the split would be 23/263 for personal use and 240/263 for rental.

Any net loss generated will be subject to the passive activity loss rules. In general, passive losses are deductible only to the extent of passive income from other sources (such as rental properties that produce income) but if your modified adjusted gross income falls below a certain amount, you may write off up to $25,000 of passive-rental real estate losses if you "actively participate". "Active participation" can be achieved by simply making the day-to-day property management decisions. Unused passive losses may be carried over to future years

Planning Note: If your personal use does exceed the greater of (1) 14 days, or (2) 10% of rental days, the special vacation home rules apply. This means you drop back into the personal residence treatment, which allows you to deduct the interest and taxes and usually wipe out your rental income with deductible operating expenses. This is explained in greater detail below.

Treated as Personal Residence

If you use your vacation home for both rental and a significant amount of personal purposes, you generally must divide your total expenses between the rental use and the personal use based on the number of days used for each purpose. Remember that personal use includes use by family members and others paying less than market rental rates. Days you spend working substantially full time repairing and maintaining your property are not counted as personal use days, even if family members use the property for recreational purposes on those days.

Rented 15 days or more. If you rent out your home more than 14 days a year and have personal use of more than (1) 14 days or (2) 10% of the rental days, whichever is greater, your home will be treated as a personal residence.

Income: You must include all of your rental receipts in your gross income. Again, however, if the property qualifies as a residence and is rented for fewer than 15 days, the rental income does not need to be included in your gross income.

Expenses:

Interest and Taxes: Mortgage interest and property taxes must be allocated between rental and personal use. Personal use for this allocation includes days the home was left vacant.

Example: You rent your mountain cabin for 4 months, have personal use for 3 months, and it sits empty for 5 months. The amount of interest and taxes allocated to rental use would be 33% (4 months/12 months) and since vacant time is considered personal use, you would allocate 67% (8 months/12 months) to personal use. The rental portion of interest and taxes would be included on Schedule E and the personal part would be claimed as itemized deductions on Schedule A.

Operating Expenses: Rental income should first be reduced by the interest and tax expenses allocated to the rental portion (33% in our example above). After that allocation is made, you can deduct a percentage of operating expenses (maintenance, utilities, association fees, insurance and depreciation) to the extent of any rental income remaining. When calculating the allocation percentage for operating expenses, vacancy days are not included. Any disallowed rental expenses are carried forward to future years.

Planning Note: It would be wise to try to balance rental and personal use so that rental income is "zeroed" out since, even though losses may be carried forward, they still risk going used. Mortgage interest should be fully deductible on Schedule A as a second residence. If more than two homes are owned, choose the vacation home with the biggest loan as the second residence. Property taxes are always deductible no matter how many homes are owned.

Rented fewer than 15 days. If you have the opportunity to rent your home out for a short period of time (< 15 days), you will not have to worry about the tax consequences. This rental period is "ignored" for tax purposes and the house would be treated purely like a personal residence with no tricky allocation methods required.

Income: You do not include any of the rental income in gross income.

Expenses: Interest and taxes are claimed on Schedule A. You can not write off any operating expenses (maintenance, utilities, etc...) attributable to the rental period.

Planning Note: Take advantage of this "tax-free" income if you get the chance. Short-term rentals during major events (such as the Olympics) can be a windfall.

Close

Limited liability companies (LLCs) remain one of the most popular choice of business forms in the U.S. today. This form of business entity is a hybrid that features the best characteristics of other forms of business entities, making it a good choice for both new and existing businesses and their owners.

An LLC is a legal entity existing separately from its owners that has certain characteristics of both a corporation (limited liability) and a partnership (pass-through taxation). An LLC is created when articles of organization (or the equivalent under each state rules) are filed with the proper state authority, and all fees are paid. An operating agreement detailing the terms agreed to by the members usually accompanies the articles of organization.

Choosing the LLC as a Business Entity

Choosing the form of business entity for a new company is one of the first decisions that a new business owner will have to make. Here's how LLCs compare to other forms of entities:

C Corporation: Both C corporations and LLCs share the favorable limited liability feature and lack of restrictions on number of shareholders. Unlike LLCs, C corporations are subject to double taxation for federal tax purposes - once at the corporate level and the again at the shareholder level. C corporations do not have the ability to make special allocations amongst the shareholders like LLCs.

S Corporation: Both S corporations and LLCs permit pass-through taxation. However, unlike an S corporation, an LLC is not limited to the number or kind of members it can have, potentially giving it greater access to capital. LLCs are also not restricted to a single class of stock, resulting in greater flexibility in the allocation of gains, losses, deductions and credits. And for estate planning purposes, LLCs are a much more flexible tool than S corporations

Partnership: Partnerships, like LLCs, are "pass-through" entities that avoid double taxation. The greatest difference between a partnership and an LLC is that members of LLCs can participate in management without being subject to personal liability, unlike general partners in a partnership.

Sole Proprietorship: Companies that operate as sole proprietors report their income and expenses on Schedule C of Form 1040. Unlike LLCs, sole proprietors' personal liability is unlimited and ownership is limited to one owner. And while generally all of the earnings of a sole proprietorship are subject to self-employment taxes, some LLC members may avoid self-employment taxes under certain circumstances

Tax Consequences of Conversion to an LLC

In most cases, changing your company's form of business to an LLC will be a tax-free transaction. However, there are a few cases where careful consideration of the tax consequences should be analyzed prior to conversion. Here are some general guidelines regarding the tax effects of converting an existing entity to an LLC:

C Corporation to an LLC: Unfortunately, this transaction most likely will be considered a liquidation of the corporation and the formation of a new LLC for federal tax purposes. This type of conversion can result in major tax consequences for the corporation as well as the shareholders and should be considered very carefully.

S Corporation to an LLC: If the corporation was never a C corporation, or wasn't a C corporation within the last 10 years, in most cases, this conversion should be tax-free at the corporate level. However, the tax consequences of such a conversion may be different for the S corporation's shareholders. Since the S corporation is a flow-through entity, and has only one level of tax at the shareholder level, any gain incurred at the corporate level passes through to the shareholders. If, at the time of conversion, the fair market value of the S corporation's assets exceeds their tax basis, the corporation's shareholders may be liable for individual income taxes. Thus, any gain incurred at the corporate level from the appreciation of assets passes through to the S corporation's shareholders when the S corporation transfers assets to the LLC.

Partnership to LLC: This conversion should be tax-free and the new LLC would be treated as a continuation of the partnership.

Sole proprietorship to an LLC: This conversion is another example of a tax-free conversion to an LLC.

While considering the potential tax consequences of conversion is important, keep in mind how your change in entity will also affect the non-tax elements of your business operations. How will a conversion to an LLC effect existing agreements with suppliers, creditors, and financial institutions?

Taxation of LLCs and "Check-the-Box" Regulations

Before federal "check-the-box" regulations were enacted at the end of 1996, it wasn't easy for LLCs to be classified as a partnership for tax purposes. However, the "check-the-box" regulations eliminated many of the difficulties of obtaining partnership tax treatment for an LLC. Under the check-the-box rules, most LLCs with two or more members would receive partnership status, thus avoiding taxation at the entity level as an "association taxed as a corporation."

If an LLC has more than 2 members, it will automatically be classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. If the LLC has only one member, it will automatically be classified as a sole proprietor and would report all income and expenses on Form 1040, Schedule C. LLCs wishing to change the automatic classification must file Form 8832, Entity Classification Election.

Keep in mind that state tax laws related to LLCs may differ from federal tax laws and should be addressed when considering the LLC as the form of business entity for your business.

Since the information provided is general in nature and may not apply to your specific circumstances, please contact the office for more information or further clarification.

Close

Owning property (real or tangible) and leasing it to your business can give you very favorable tax results, not to mention good long-term benefits. There are some drawbacks, however, and you should consider all factors before structuring such an arrangement.

BENEFITS

Since you own the property personally, it is protected from the creditors of the Company should it be sued or run into financial difficulty.

Real estate leasing outside of the corporation will offer better tax and financial advantages compared to the rental of personal property such as equipment. These advantages can include the avoidance of corporate double tax on the appreciation of the real estate, along with estate planning advantages from the step up in basis if the property is owned by the individual or partnership.

Allows the individual taxpayer to remove earnings from the company without payment of employment taxes or increasing the possibility of unreasonable compensation issues.

DRAWBACKS

If you are a non-corporate lessor and leasing personal property (machinery, equipment, etc.), you will have to comply with special rules in order to claim the Sec. 179 expense deduction.

You need to charge a fair rental for your real estate or equipment. Inflated rental rates may be recharacterized as dividends if coming from a corporation.

Leasing property to your own C Corporation cannot generate passive income. Income will be reclassified as "active" while losses will remain "passive", removing the ability to use this transaction to offset other "passive" losses.

Proper planning and knowledge of the various tax issues is important when considering this type of arrangement. Feel free to contact us for a better understanding of how these situations would effect you before you proceed.

Close

As a service to our clients we are providing a list of the web sites for most major automoblie manufacturers.

Website Directory

AUTOMOTIVE MANUFATURERS:

ACURAhttp://www.acura.com AUDIhttp://www.audiiusa BMWhttp://www.bmwusa.com CADILLAChttp://www.cadillac.com CHEVROLEThttp://www.chevrolet.com CHRYSLERhttp://www.chryslercars.com DODGEhttp://www.4adodge.com FORDhttp://www.ford.com HONDAhttp://www.honda.com JAGUARhttp://www.jaguarcars.com JEEPhttp://www.jeep.com LAND ROVERhttp://www.landrover.com LEXUShttp://www.lexus.com MAZDAhttp://www.mazdausa.com MERCEDES-BENZhttp://www.mbusa.com NISSANhttp://www.nissan-usa.com OLDSMOBILEhttp://www.oldsmobile.com PANOZhttp://www.panozauto.com PONTIAChttp://www.pontiac.com PORSCHEhttp://www.porsce.com SAABhttp://www.saabusa.com SUBARUhttp://www.subaru.com TOYOTAhttp://www.toyota.com VOLKSWAGENhttp://www.vw.com VOLVOhttp://www.volvocars.com

Close